Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural
Belarus
25.6%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
26.3%
in 2020
Belarus rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 26.3% against 25.6% in Belarus, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 26.3% against 25.6% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance -rural?
- Belarus ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population