Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash
Costa Rica
31.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
31.8%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 31.8% against 31.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 33.0% | 29.7% | 3.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 31.8% | 7.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 31.8% against 31.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional cash?
- Costa Rica ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population