Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Kyrgyzstan
13.0%
in 2020
Poland
13.7%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Poland rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13.7% against 13.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 13.7% against 13.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population