Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Kyrgyzstan
9.2%
in 2020
Poland
8.6%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
21st
Poland rank
23rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 9.2% against 8.6% in Poland, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Poland ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.8% | 9.0% | 1.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 9.1% | 9.9% | 0.8% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 9.2% against 8.6% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 21st and Poland ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population