Ecuador vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Ecuador
8.9%
in 2022
Poland
8.6%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
18th
Poland rank
19th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8.9% against 8.6% in Poland, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 18th and Poland ranks 19th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.0% | 8.4% | 2.4% | Poland |
| 2010s | 8.4% | 9.4% | 1.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Ecuador or Poland?
- Ecuador, at 8.9% against 8.6% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Ecuador and Poland?
- 0.3%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Ecuador ranks 18th and Poland ranks 19th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population