Ecuador vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Ecuador
9.3%
in 2022
Poland
10.1%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
17th
Poland rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 10.1% against 9.3% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Poland ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.0% | 8.1% | 1.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 9.7% | 9.4% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Ecuador or Poland?
- Poland, at 10.1% against 9.3% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Ecuador and Poland?
- 0.8%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Poland ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population