Argentina vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private
Argentina
10.5%
in 2022
Poland
10.1%
in 2019
Argentina rank
14th
Poland rank
16th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 10.5% against 10.1% in Poland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 14th and Poland ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.2% | 8.3% | 2.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 13.9% | 10.0% | 3.9% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private, Argentina or Poland?
- Argentina, at 10.5% against 10.1% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private between Argentina and Poland?
- 0.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
- Argentina ranks 14th and Poland ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population