Peru vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Peru
13.9%
in 2022
Serbia
14.8%
in 2022
Peru rank
12th
Serbia rank
9th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14.8% against 13.9% in Peru, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.9% | 14.0% | 0.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 13.4% | 15.5% | 2.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14.8% against 13.9% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.9%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Peru ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population