Kyrgyzstan vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Kyrgyzstan
14.5%
in 2020
Peru
13.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Peru rank
12th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Peru
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 14.5% against 13.9% in Peru, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Peru ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Peru ranks 12th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.2% | 13.7% | 0.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 14.5% | 12.6% | 2.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Kyrgyzstan or Peru?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 14.5% against 13.9% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Peru ranks 12th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population