Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Dominican Republic
13.1%
in 2021
Kazakhstan
13.1%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
15th
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 13.1% against 13.1% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 36 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.7% | 15.8% | 6.1% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 13.0% | 0.6% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 13.1% | 0.0% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Dominican Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 13.1% against 13.1% in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Dominican Republic ranks 15th and Kazakhstan ranks 14th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population