Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Chile
34.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
32.7%
in 2020
Chile rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 34.9% against 32.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 22.2% | 7.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 17.1% | 34.7% | 17.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 18.7% | 32.7% | 14.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 34.9% against 32.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population