Ecuador vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Ecuador
2.3%
in 2022
South Africa
0.7%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
30th
South Africa rank
33rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2.3% against 0.7% in South Africa, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 3.3 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.2% | 12.7% | 9.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 0.5% | 3.1% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 2.3% against 0.7% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 1.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Ecuador ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 33rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population