Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Kyrgyzstan
35.6%
in 2020
Uruguay
43.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Uruguay rank
4th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 43.7% against 35.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.5% | 36.5% | 6.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 35.6% | 43.8% | 8.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 43.7% against 35.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8.1%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population