Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Argentina
44.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
35.6%
in 2020
Argentina rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 44.0% against 35.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 8.4%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Argentina ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.9% | 24.9% | 4.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 32.2% | 8.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 28.1% | 35.6% | 7.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 44.0% against 35.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Argentina ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population