Belarus vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
30.2%
in 2019
Uruguay
41.7%
in 2022
Belarus rank
6th
Uruguay rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 41.7% against 30.2% in Belarus, a difference of 11.5%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 32.1% | 1.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 29.5% | 33.1% | 3.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 41.7% against 30.2% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 11.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population