Mongolia vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Mongolia
33.6%
in 2020
Peru
36.4%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
26th
Peru rank
23rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 36.4% against 33.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 26th and Peru ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.8% | 62.0% | 35.2% | Peru |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 64.4% | 39.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 33.6% | 28.2% | 5.3% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 36.4% against 33.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Mongolia and Peru?
- 2.8%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Mongolia ranks 26th and Peru ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population