Georgia vs Peru: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Georgia
39.9%
in 2021
Peru
36.4%
in 2022
Georgia rank
20th
Peru rank
23rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Georgia
- Peru
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 39.9% against 36.4% in Peru, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Peru ahead.
Georgia ranks 20th and Peru ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.5% | 62.9% | 23.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 28.8% | 11.2% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Georgia or Peru?
- Georgia, at 39.9% against 36.4% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Georgia and Peru?
- 3.5%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Peru rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Georgia ranks 20th and Peru ranks 23rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population