How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Peru?

5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Republic of Moldova vs Peru: Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile

Republic of Moldova

30.2%

in 2018

Peru

30.3%

in 2022

Republic of Moldova rank

12th

Peru rank

11th

Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile over time

Republic of Moldova
Peru

How they compare

Peru currently reports 30.3% against 30.2% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 12th and Peru ranks 11th of 35 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile, Republic of Moldova or Peru?: Peru, at 30.3% against 30.2% in Republic of Moldova as of 2022.
What is the difference in benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile between Republic of Moldova and Peru?: 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Peru?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Republic of Moldova and Peru rank globally for benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile?: Republic of Moldova ranks 12th and Peru ranks 11th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Peru: Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-incidence-of-social-safety-net-programs-to-poorest-quintile-percent-of-total/moldova/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-incidence-of-social-safety-net-programs-to-poorest-quintile-percent-of-total/moldova/peru/">Republic of Moldova vs Peru: Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits)
Unit: % of total safety net benefits
Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 35 places, 348 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile shows the percentage of total social safety net benefits received by the poorest 20% of the population. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.