Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile
Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 29.7% against 29.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.7% | 28.0% | 2.8% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 19.3% | 29.3% | 9.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 29.7% against 29.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile shows the percentage of total social safety net benefits received by the poorest 20% of the population. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.