Argentina vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile

Argentina
44.0%
in 2022
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
50.8%
in 2017
Argentina rank
3rd
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
1st

Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile over time

  • Argentina
  • Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
0204060200620142022

How they compare

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 50.8% against 44.0% in Argentina, a difference of 6.8%.

That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 3rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st of 35 countries.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) Difference Ahead
2000s 20.9% 38.8% 17.9% Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
2010s 33.3% 48.7% 15.5% Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile, Argentina or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 50.8% against 44.0% in Argentina as of 2017.
What is the difference in benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile between Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
6.8%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
How do Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile?
Argentina ranks 3rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-incidence-of-social-safety-net-programs-to-poorest-quintile-percent-of-total/argentina/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-incidence-of-social-safety-net-programs-to-poorest-quintile-percent-of-total/argentina/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Argentina vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits)
Unit
% of total safety net benefits
Source
ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 348 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile shows the percentage of total social safety net benefits received by the poorest 20% of the population. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.