Georgia vs Serbia: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile

Georgia
0.5766 poorest
in 2021
Serbia
0.6394 poorest
in 2022
Georgia rank
4th
Serbia rank
1st

Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time

  • Georgia
  • Serbia
00.20.40.6200720142022

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.6394 poorest against 0.5766 poorest in Georgia, a difference of 0.0628 poorest.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 1st of 26 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5738 poorest 0.5814 poorest 0.0076 poorest Serbia
2020s 0.5766 poorest 0.6338 poorest 0.0572 poorest Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Georgia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.6394 poorest against 0.5766 poorest in Georgia as of 2022.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Georgia and Serbia?
0.0628 poorest, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
Georgia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 1st of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Serbia: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-unconditional-cash-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/georgia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-unconditional-cash-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/georgia/serbia/">Georgia vs Serbia: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 222 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)