Colombia vs El Salvador: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Colombia
0.2351 poorest
in 2022
El Salvador
0.149 poorest
in 2022
Colombia rank
24th
El Salvador rank
25th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Colombia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.2351 poorest against 0.149 poorest in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0861 poorest.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.6 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was El Salvador ahead.
Colombia ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2174 poorest | 0.3804 poorest | 0.163 poorest | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.2254 poorest | 0.1616 poorest | 0.0638 poorest | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Colombia or El Salvador?
- Colombia, at 0.2351 poorest against 0.149 poorest in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Colombia and El Salvador?
- 0.0861 poorest, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and El Salvador?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and El Salvador rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Colombia ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)