Armenia vs Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile

Armenia
0.3941
in 2022
Chile
0.4072
in 2022
Armenia rank
17th
Chile rank
16th

Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile over time

  • Armenia
  • Chile
00.20.40.6200620142022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.4072 against 0.3941 in Armenia, a difference of 0.0131.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 17th and Chile ranks 16th of 25 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5065 0.3566 0.1499 Armenia
2010s 0.4527 0.3264 0.1262 Armenia
2020s 0.373 0.4034 0.0304 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers - 1st quintile, Armenia or Chile?
Chile, at 0.4072 against 0.3941 in Armenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers - 1st quintile between Armenia and Chile?
0.0131, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers - 1st quintile?
Armenia ranks 17th and Chile ranks 16th of 25 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-unconditional-cash-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/armenia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-unconditional-cash-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/armenia/chile/">Armenia vs Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 211 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)