Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Kyrgyzstan
0.4403
in 2020
Poland
0.4452
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Poland rank
12th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.4452 against 0.4403 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0049.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and Poland ranks 12th of 24 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4358 | 0.4913 | 0.0555 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.4011 | 0.4995 | 0.0984 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.4452 against 0.4403 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.0049, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and Poland ranks 12th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)