Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Costa Rica
0.4334
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.4403
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.4403 against 0.4334 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0069.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4104 | 0.4102 | 0.0001 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.3675 | 0.4403 | 0.0728 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.4403 against 0.4334 in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0069, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Costa Rica ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)