Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor
Mongolia
0.0502 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Viet Nam
0.0442 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Mongolia rank
12th
Viet Nam rank
13th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0502 <$2.15 a day against 0.0442 <$2.15 a day in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.006 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0301 <$2.15 a day | 0.0425 <$2.15 a day | 0.0124 <$2.15 a day | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.0502 <$2.15 a day | 0.0442 <$2.15 a day | 0.006 <$2.15 a day | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 0.0502 <$2.15 a day against 0.0442 <$2.15 a day in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.006 <$2.15 a day, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Mongolia ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)