Mexico vs Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor
Mexico
0.0321 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Viet Nam
0.0442 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Mexico rank
15th
Viet Nam rank
13th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor over time
- Mexico
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.0442 <$2.15 a day against 0.0321 <$2.15 a day in Mexico, a difference of 0.0121 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0499 <$2.15 a day | 0.0425 <$2.15 a day | 0.0074 <$2.15 a day | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.0372 <$2.15 a day | 0.0442 <$2.15 a day | 0.007 <$2.15 a day | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor, Mexico or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.0442 <$2.15 a day against 0.0321 <$2.15 a day in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor between Mexico and Viet Nam?
- 0.0121 <$2.15 a day, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Viet Nam rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Mexico ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)