Colombia vs Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor
Colombia
0.0287 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Viet Nam
0.0442 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Colombia rank
16th
Viet Nam rank
13th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor over time
- Colombia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.0442 <$2.15 a day against 0.0287 <$2.15 a day in Colombia, a difference of 0.0155 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.5 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Colombia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0335 <$2.15 a day | 0.0425 <$2.15 a day | 0.009 <$2.15 a day | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.0449 <$2.15 a day | 0.0442 <$2.15 a day | 0.0007 <$2.15 a day | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor, Colombia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.0442 <$2.15 a day against 0.0287 <$2.15 a day in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor between Colombia and Viet Nam?
- 0.0155 <$2.15 a day, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Colombia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)