Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor
Armenia
0.1466 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.1636 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Armenia rank
4th
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.1636 <$2.15 a day against 0.1466 <$2.15 a day in Armenia, a difference of 0.017 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1638 <$2.15 a day | 0.1535 <$2.15 a day | 0.0103 <$2.15 a day | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.1349 <$2.15 a day | 0.1636 <$2.15 a day | 0.0287 <$2.15 a day | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.1636 <$2.15 a day against 0.1466 <$2.15 a day in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.017 <$2.15 a day, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -extreme poor?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)