Georgia vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile
Georgia
0.2271
in 2021
South Africa
0.289
in 2021
Georgia rank
10th
South Africa rank
7th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.289 against 0.2271 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0619.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2282 | 0.2418 | 0.0136 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.2501 | 0.2621 | 0.012 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.289 against 0.2271 in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile between Georgia and South Africa?
- 0.0619, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile?
- Georgia ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)