Ecuador vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile
Ecuador
0.0521
in 2022
Poland
0.0022
in 2019
Ecuador rank
25th
Poland rank
27th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0521 against 0.0022 in Poland, a difference of 0.0499.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 23.3 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Poland ranks 27th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1187 | 0.2663 | 0.1476 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.1156 | 0.2391 | 0.1236 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile, Ecuador or Poland?
- Ecuador, at 0.0521 against 0.0022 in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile between Ecuador and Poland?
- 0.0499, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Poland ranks 27th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)