Ecuador vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile

Ecuador
0.0521
in 2022
Peru
0.0782
in 2022
Ecuador rank
25th
Peru rank
24th

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
00.050.10.15200820152022

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0782 against 0.0521 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0261.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 24th of 27 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1187 0.0545 0.0642 Ecuador
2010s 0.1085 0.0727 0.0358 Ecuador
2020s 0.089 0.0604 0.0286 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile, Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0782 against 0.0521 in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile between Ecuador and Peru?
0.0261, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile?
Ecuador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 24th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)