Chile vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile

Chile
0.1008
in 2022
Peru
0.0782
in 2022
Chile rank
21st
Peru rank
24th

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile over time

  • Chile
  • Peru
00.050.10.150.2200820152022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1008 against 0.0782 in Peru, a difference of 0.0226.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Peru ahead.

Chile ranks 21st and Peru ranks 24th of 27 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Peru Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1156 0.0659 0.0497 Chile
2020s 0.1243 0.0495 0.0747 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile, Chile or Peru?
Chile, at 0.1008 against 0.0782 in Peru as of 2022.
What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile between Chile and Peru?
0.0226, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Chile and Peru rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers - 1st quintile?
Chile ranks 21st and Peru ranks 24th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/chile/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-urban/chile/peru/">Chile vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 259 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)