Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -extreme poor
Mongolia
0.0387 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Viet Nam
0.0444 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
Mongolia rank
14th
Viet Nam rank
12th
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -extreme poor over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.0444 <$2.15 a day against 0.0387 <$2.15 a day in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0057 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 12th of 31 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0309 <$2.15 a day | 0.039 <$2.15 a day | 0.0081 <$2.15 a day | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.0387 <$2.15 a day | 0.0444 <$2.15 a day | 0.0057 <$2.15 a day | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -extreme poor, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.0444 <$2.15 a day against 0.0387 <$2.15 a day in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -extreme poor between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.0057 <$2.15 a day, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -extreme poor?
- Mongolia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 12th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)