Honduras vs Thailand: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor
Honduras
0.0415 <$2.15 a day
in 2019
Thailand
0.038 <$2.15 a day
in 2021
Honduras rank
19th
Thailand rank
21st
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor over time
- Honduras
- Thailand
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 0.0415 <$2.15 a day against 0.038 <$2.15 a day in Thailand, a difference of 0.0035 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 19th and Thailand ranks 21st of 37 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0459 <$2.15 a day | 0.0241 <$2.15 a day | 0.0218 <$2.15 a day | Honduras |
| 2010s | 0.0752 <$2.15 a day | 0.0313 <$2.15 a day | 0.044 <$2.15 a day | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor, Honduras or Thailand?
- Honduras, at 0.0415 <$2.15 a day against 0.038 <$2.15 a day in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor between Honduras and Thailand?
- 0.0035 <$2.15 a day, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Thailand rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor?
- Honduras ranks 19th and Thailand ranks 21st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)