Ecuador vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor
Ecuador
0.0165 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Peru
0.0255 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Ecuador rank
28th
Peru rank
25th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0255 <$2.15 a day against 0.0165 <$2.15 a day in Ecuador, a difference of 0.009 <$2.15 a day.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.5 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 28th and Peru ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0662 <$2.15 a day | 0.0367 <$2.15 a day | 0.0295 <$2.15 a day | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0339 <$2.15 a day | 0.0217 <$2.15 a day | 0.0122 <$2.15 a day | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0318 <$2.15 a day | 0.0304 <$2.15 a day | 0.0014 <$2.15 a day | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.0255 <$2.15 a day against 0.0165 <$2.15 a day in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor between Ecuador and Peru?
- 0.009 <$2.15 a day, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -extreme poor?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and Peru ranks 25th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)