Thailand vs Uruguay: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Thailand
0.1728 poorest
in 2021
Uruguay
0.1824 poorest
in 2022
Thailand rank
20th
Uruguay rank
19th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Thailand
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.1824 poorest against 0.1728 poorest in Thailand, a difference of 0.0096 poorest.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 19th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Thailand averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1531 poorest | 0.1272 poorest | 0.0259 poorest | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.1629 poorest | 0.2106 poorest | 0.0476 poorest | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.1728 poorest | 0.19 poorest | 0.0171 poorest | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Thailand or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.1824 poorest against 0.1728 poorest in Thailand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Thailand and Uruguay?
- 0.0096 poorest, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Thailand and Uruguay rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Thailand ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 19th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)