Indonesia vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Indonesia
0.3482 poorest
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.3738 poorest
in 2020
Indonesia rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Indonesia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.3738 poorest against 0.3482 poorest in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0256 poorest.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 37 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3623 poorest | 0.3871 poorest | 0.0248 poorest | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.3423 poorest | 0.3738 poorest | 0.0315 poorest | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Indonesia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.3738 poorest against 0.3482 poorest in Indonesia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0256 poorest, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Indonesia ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)