Ecuador vs Paraguay: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Ecuador
0.1008 poorest
in 2022
Paraguay
0.1229 poorest
in 2022
Ecuador rank
33rd
Paraguay rank
30th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Ecuador
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.1229 poorest against 0.1008 poorest in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0221 poorest.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 30th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1497 poorest | 0.0509 poorest | 0.0988 poorest | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.12 poorest | 0.1054 poorest | 0.0146 poorest | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.1192 poorest | 0.1269 poorest | 0.0077 poorest | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Ecuador or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.1229 poorest against 0.1008 poorest in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Ecuador and Paraguay?
- 0.0221 poorest, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Paraguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Paraguay rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 30th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)