Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Dominican Republic
0.1712 poorest
in 2021
Pakistan
0.1697 poorest
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
21st
Pakistan rank
23rd
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 0.1712 poorest against 0.1697 poorest in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0015 poorest.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1143 poorest | 0.1431 poorest | 0.0289 poorest | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.1389 poorest | 0.1404 poorest | 0.0015 poorest | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 0.1712 poorest against 0.1697 poorest in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 0.0015 poorest, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)