Brazil vs El Salvador: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Brazil
0.1562 poorest
in 2022
El Salvador
0.1573 poorest
in 2022
Brazil rank
26th
El Salvador rank
25th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Brazil
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.1573 poorest against 0.1562 poorest in Brazil, a difference of 0.0011 poorest.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 26th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1113 poorest | 0.0564 poorest | 0.0549 poorest | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.1271 poorest | 0.0482 poorest | 0.0789 poorest | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.138 poorest | 0.1517 poorest | 0.0137 poorest | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Brazil or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 0.1573 poorest against 0.1562 poorest in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Brazil and El Salvador?
- 0.0011 poorest, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and El Salvador rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Brazil ranks 26th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)