Dominican Republic vs Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile
Dominican Republic
0.1996
in 2021
Peru
0.2112
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
25th
Peru rank
23rd
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile over time
- Dominican Republic
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.2112 against 0.1996 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0116.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Peru ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2079 | 0.1883 | 0.0195 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1705 | 0.1939 | 0.0234 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.1996 | 0.2096 | 0.01 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile, Dominican Republic or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.2112 against 0.1996 in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile between Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 0.0116, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Peru rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Peru ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)