El Salvador vs Mongolia: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -extreme poor
El Salvador
0.0304 <$2.15 a day
in 2022
Mongolia
0.0209 <$2.15 a day
in 2020
El Salvador rank
24th
Mongolia rank
27th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -extreme poor over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.0304 <$2.15 a day against 0.0209 <$2.15 a day in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0095 <$2.15 a day.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.5 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 35 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2604 <$2.15 a day | 0.0813 <$2.15 a day | 0.1791 <$2.15 a day | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.1422 <$2.15 a day | 0.0225 <$2.15 a day | 0.1197 <$2.15 a day | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -extreme poor, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 0.0304 <$2.15 a day against 0.0209 <$2.15 a day in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -extreme poor between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.0095 <$2.15 a day, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -extreme poor?
- El Salvador ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -extreme poor (<$2.15 a day). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Social Assistance programs (%)