Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -1st quintile
Kazakhstan
0.41 poorest
in 2021
Mongolia
0.3769 poorest
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Mongolia rank
17th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -1st quintile over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.41 poorest against 0.3769 poorest in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0331 poorest.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2539 poorest | 0.2715 poorest | 0.0176 poorest | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.335 poorest | 0.2866 poorest | 0.0484 poorest | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.4044 poorest | 0.3769 poorest | 0.0275 poorest | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -1st quintile, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.41 poorest against 0.3769 poorest in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -1st quintile between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 0.0331 poorest, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all social assistance -1st quintile?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Assistance -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Social Assistance programs (%)