Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Chile
4.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
5.4%
in 2020
Chile rank
21st
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 5.4% against 4.2% in Chile, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.2% | 5.4% | 3.8% | Chile |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 7.8% | 2.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 5.4% | 1.8% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 5.4% against 4.2% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Chile ranks 21st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population