Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional
Kyrgyzstan
3.4%
in 2020
South Africa
3.4%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
23rd
South Africa rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.4% against 3.4% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 24th of 30 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.8% | 3.8% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 4.1% | 0.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.4% against 3.4% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 24th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population