Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Dominican Republic
23.3%
in 2021
Serbia
23.8%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
19th
Serbia rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 23.8% against 23.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 16th of 28 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.0% | 26.1% | 4.9% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 24.5% | 26.6% | 2.0% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23.3% | 28.1% | 4.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 23.8% against 23.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Dominican Republic ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 16th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population