Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kyrgyzstan
12.4%
in 2020
South Africa
10.3%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
South Africa rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 12.4% against 10.3% in South Africa, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.5% | 10.9% | 0.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 12.4% | 12.6% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 12.4% against 10.3% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 2.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 20th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population