Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash

Chile
14.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
15.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th

Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time

  • Chile
  • Kyrgyzstan
5101520200620142022

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 15.6% against 14.7% in Chile, a difference of 0.9%.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 27 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2000s 22.3% 8.3% 14.0% Chile
2010s 18.5% 10.4% 8.0% Chile
2020s 18.6% 15.6% 3.0% Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 15.6% against 14.7% in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
0.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
Chile ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/chile/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/beneficiary-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/chile/kyrgyz-republic/">Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 230 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population