Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
20.7%
in 2020
Poland
20.5%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
16th
Poland rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 20.7% against 20.5% in Poland, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 17th of 28 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.5% | 18.5% | 6.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 24.1% | 19.9% | 4.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 20.7% against 20.5% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 17th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population